عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]چکیده [English]
In this study, the question is whether human actions and deeds are worthy and good to good and bad without being accountable to them. Or actions
Human beings are neither good nor bad at all, but their good and bad depends on the person's opinion. Is there a connection between the wisdom and the religious order? If the reason is good or good
He ruled, does the same wisdom rule that the decree is required by the Shari'a according to it? In other words, is "the whole of our judgment for the judgment of Allah" is true? Special scholars and public opinion on the virtue of verbs in which the judge disputes good and evil, reason, or shariah. In a coincidence study, a rule with verbal and principled jurisprudence has been tried, which can be exploited in the silence of laws and laws of today, and can be used in recreational areas. In this paper, we are going to answer these questions and explain the efficiency of the rule in various sciences. It can be said briefly and concisely that, as it understands the wisdom of the present goodness, it also recognizes that the verb has the same verdict with the accuser because, if it is permissible to discriminate against wisdom, or to make a mistake and error We attribute either to reason and to both of them impossible, and with the affirmation of the connection between the ruling of Shari'a with common sense, we have expressed the existence of many examples of the application of this rule in the law. This rule is effective in addition to the ethical and theological issues in today's law of law.